Eric Vanshelboim vs Milan Drinic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

E. Vanshelboim vs M. Drinic

Eric Vanshelboim
Eric Vanshelboim

Flag UKR UKR

l
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
Milan Drinic
Milan Drinic

Flag SRB SRB

w
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l

0

Win

0

Played

0

Win

24
Age
28
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
466
C. Rank
887
357
Best Rank
635
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Vanshelboim 0 - 0 Drinic

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Vanshelboim0
Drinic0
Last 0 H2H Matches:

No past h2h happened.

E. Vanshelboim vs M. Drinic H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
63.79% (273-155)Career Total W/L54.66% (170-141)
5Titles1
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

E. Vanshelboim vs M. Drinic Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eric Vanshelboim has won 41.71% of points on their second serve, while Milan Drinic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eric Vanshelboim, in recent form, has won 47.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Milan Drinic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.44% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Eric Vanshelboim has saved 49.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Milan Drinic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Eric Vanshelboim has won 62.67% of matches played (W/L 47/28), with Milan Drinic winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Eric Vanshelboim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 199/109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/4). Milan Drinic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 126/102), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 44/39).
  • Player level: In the last year, Eric Vanshelboim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 42/22), where as Milan Drinic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eric Vanshelboim has played against opponents with an average rank of 428.65 while Milan Drinic has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eric Vanshelboim has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Milan Drinic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Eric Vanshelboim has converted 36.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Milan Drinic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Eric Vanshelboim vs Milan Drinic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Vanshelboim 51%, Drinic 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Vanshelboim 55%, Drinic 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Vanshelboim 55%, Drinic 0%.

E. Vanshelboim Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM25 Luanda - 17-11-2025

R2

GERM. Majdandzic
L
7-5 6-2

R1

GERY. Kelm
W
6-2 6-1
HardM15 Luanda - 10-11-2025

SF

GERY. Kelm
L
6-4 6-3

QF

ANGD. Domingos
W
6-2 6-0

R2

ITAA. Bacaloni
W
6-0 6-3

M. Drinic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM15 Kursumlijska Banja - 12-08-2024

Q3

NEDC. Lerby
L
2-6 6-3 12-10

Q2

ITAS. Vedovelli
W
7-6(5) 6-1

Q1

RUSA. Krylov
W
6-3 6-0
ClayM15 Kursumlijska Banja - 29-07-2024

R1

GERL. Ruland
L
7-6(5) 7-6(7)

Q3

SWEF. Gustafsson
W
3-6 6-2 10-4
banner

E. Vanshelboim vs M. Drinic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
63.79% (273/155)YTD Win/Loss54.66% (170/141)
59.83% (578/388)Sets Win/Loss54.48% (395/330)
54.37% (4726/3967)Games Win/Loss51.79% (3525/3281)
61.82% (68/42)Hard Win/Loss53.01% (44/39)
64.61% (199/109)Clay Win/Loss55.26% (126/102)
60.00% (6/4)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
0.1Aces Per Game0.11
434Aces Total355
0.2Double Faults Per Game0.21
867Total Double Faults697
1:41:59Average Match Time1st Match
476.86Average Opponent Rank359.58
73% (19169/26412)1st Serve %60% (6731/11311)
62% (11972/19169)1st Serve Win %63% (4238/6731)
48% (3505/7242)2nd Serve Win %47% (2144/4579)
48% (1552/3257)Break Points Won % (Total)44% (523/1176)
45% (12012/26805)Return Points Win %42% (4678/11158)
0.00% (0/1)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
49.09% (27/28)Challenger W/L50.00% (1/1)
66.13% (246/126)Futures W/L54.69% (169/140)
64% (267/417)Best of 3 Sets Win %54% (164/302)
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %33% (1/3)
52% (53/102)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)47% (33/70)
69% (82/119)Deciding Set Win %46% (49/106)
91% (247/225)1st Set Won, Won Match83% (172/143)
9% (247/22)1st Set Won, Lost Match17% (172/29)
27% (181/48)1st Set Lost, Won Match20% (139/28)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Tue, 25 Nov, 09:00 AM
Prediction
GERN. EhrenschneiderALT
FRAM. Erhard4
W1
2.28
W2
1.54
Mon, 24 Nov, 11:05 PM
Prediction
ARGJ. P. Ficovich1
BRAM. Alves
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Mon, 24 Nov, 11:10 PM
Prediction
COLS. PriceWC
USAT. Mccormick
W1
3.04
W2
1.32
Tue, 25 Nov, 09:30 AM
Prediction
GBRZ. Stephens
TURG. SaritasALT
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Tue, 25 Nov, 01:00 PM
Prediction
GRED. SakellaridisWC
ITAE. D. Valle
W1
3.04
W2
1.32
Tue, 25 Nov, 05:30 AM
Prediction
AUSJ. M. Kubler5
AUSL. Tu
W1
1.44
W2
2.55

Potential H2H Matches This Week

Vanshelboim (M25 Luanda)
Vanshelboim vs KouzmineCould play in The Quarterfinals
Vanshelboim vs MccarthyCould play in The Quarterfinals
Vanshelboim vs BacaloniCould play in The Quarterfinals
Vanshelboim vs SzymkowiakCould play in The Quarterfinals
Vanshelboim vs FueleCould play in The Second
Vanshelboim vs BojarskiCould play in The Second